BCBS Discussion Paper: Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions
EBF advisor: Denisa Mularova
Publication date: 12 January 2017
The regulatory framework must ensure that the same potential losses are not covered both by capital and provisions.
Discussions on the treatment of excess provisioning should be accelerated. The revision of the treatment of accounting provisions cannot take place in blocks without considering all relevant major aspects altogether.
Provisions in excess of 12 months should be considered for capital purposes regardless of the capital method used to calculate capital.
Excesses and shortfalls in provisions should be treated symmetrically both under the standardized approach (STA) and internal ratings-based (IRB) approaches. If this symmetrical treatment is accepted, then the regulatory EL could be useful in providing a basis for such a symmetrical treatment for STA. However it needs further considerations and recalibrations to eliminate overlaps.
“Modern Governance in Banking” is a new modular programme of three three-day modules at the INSEAD business school in Fontainebleau, France. The content is driven by the needs for bank directors and senior executives working in banks to review and update their corporate governance practices due to the many pressures they face, and will focus on the effectiveness of directors and boards. Successful completion by participants offers certification by INSEAD. Read more
Great news that @Europarl_EN has adopted the 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive. These new rules will improve the fight against #moneylaundering and #terroristfinancing across the EU. #EPlenary https://t.co/qCB5GQ1OiM
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.